You can leave a demanding career behind and still build yourself another demanding job. The difference begins with the decisions you make before you start.

There is something wonderfully exciting about deciding to build a business of your own. Particularly when you’ve spent decades working within organisations, making decisions, solving problems and delivering results for someone else.

You begin to imagine the possibilities. Working on your own terms. Choosing your clients. Deciding what deserves your time. Having more control over your income and how you spend your days.

And then, almost without noticing, you begin designing a business around everything you know how to do.

You look at your experience and start considering all the different ways someone might pay you for it. It’s a perfectly understandable place to begin.

But I think there’s a more important question to answer first.

What kind of business do you actually want to own?

Because being qualified to deliver a service and wanting to build a business around delivering that service are two very different things.

Your Experience Is an Asset. It Isn’t Your Business Model.

The problem begins when you confuse what you’re capable of delivering with what you actually want your working life to look like.

If you’ve spent years being the person everyone calls when something needs sorting out, do you really want to build a business where clients pay you to remain that person?

Perhaps you do. Perhaps you love the work and simply want to do it independently.

But perhaps the whole reason you’re considering a business is that you want a different relationship with your time, your responsibilities and your income.

Those are not minor details to consider later.

They belong at the very beginning.

Decide What You Want Your Business to Give You

Before you choose your offer, I would ask you to make four decisions.

Not about your website, your logo or what to call yourself.

About the business itself.

1. How much of your time are you willing to sell?

A service business can be an excellent way to begin earning independently. It allows you to work directly with clients, understand their problems and get paid for your expertise.

But there’s an important distinction between owning your business and owning your time.

If every dollar you earn requires another hour of your personal involvement, you’ve created a business with a clear capacity limit.

That isn’t automatically a bad thing.

It becomes a problem when your reason for leaving your previous career was to have more freedom, yet your new income depends on keeping your calendar full.

Decide how much direct client work you actually want to do.

And be honest about whether you want to spend the next five years doing it.

2. What income does the business need to produce?

I hear people talk about wanting a successful business without defining what success means financially.

But the number matters.

A business designed to generate an additional $2,000 a month looks very different from one intended to replace a senior executive salary.

The pricing, the number of clients, the delivery model and the way you attract customers all need to support that ambition.

And revenue isn’t the same as personal income. The business has costs, taxes and periods when sales are slower.

Start with the amount you want the business to provide for you, then work backwards.

Not because money is the only measure of success.

Because financial independence becomes rather difficult when we refuse to discuss the finances.

3. How much responsibility do you want to carry?

This is one of the questions I find particularly interesting.

Many accomplished women have spent years carrying enormous responsibility. People, budgets, deadlines, performance, expectations and the endless decisions that come with them.

When they start their own businesses, they sometimes recreate that same structure without meaning to.

They build teams before they need them. Introduce multiple services. Accept complicated client arrangements. Make themselves available for every question.

And before long, the business that was supposed to create independence begins demanding the same kind of attention as the career they wanted to leave.

You don’t need to build a large organisation to build a valuable business.

You need to build one that makes sense for your ambitions.

4. What do you want to be doing three years from now?

This question changes the conversation.

If you want to spend your days working closely with clients, build around that.

If you want to teach, create, write or develop intellectual property, explore a model that makes those activities central.

If you want a business that can eventually generate revenue without your direct involvement in every transaction, that needs to influence what you create from the beginning.

None of these models is inherently superior.

But they lead to very different working lives.

And that’s precisely why you need to choose deliberately.

Don’t Build Everything You Know How to Build

One of the advantages of starting a business later in your career is that you’re not short of options.

One of the disadvantages is that you’re not short of options.

You can see opportunities everywhere because you’ve accumulated the knowledge to recognise them.

You can easily convince yourself that offering more will make your business more attractive.

I would argue the opposite. At least in the beginning.

The more different problems you promise to solve, the harder it becomes for someone to understand exactly why they should come to you.

And the more different ways you deliver your expertise, the more complicated your business becomes to operate.

Start with one clearly defined problem for a specific group of people.

Develop an offer that solves it.

Find out whether people are willing to pay for that solution.

Then learn from what happens.

You can expand later. You don’t need to build the entire business before you’ve made your first sale.

Build Around the Life You Want, Not the Career You Had

When I began developing my own business, I knew one thing very clearly.

I didn’t want to recreate the working life I’d already had.

I have enormous respect for the experience I’ve accumulated, and I intend to use it. But I don’t want every opportunity to earn money to depend on me personally being available to deliver another service.

That has influenced the decisions I’m making about my own business.

I’m interested in creating practical tools, workshops and programmes that allow me to share what I’ve learned in ways that are useful to other women, while gradually building a business that isn’t entirely dependent on selling my time.

I’m still building it. Still testing what works. Still learning what people need and what they’re willing to pay for.

And I’m very aware that having a clear idea of the business you want doesn’t mean you’ve already built it.

But it does mean you have something against which to evaluate your decisions.

When a new opportunity appears, you can ask whether it moves you towards that business or simply gives you another way to stay busy.

That distinction matters.

Because after years of working, I don’t believe the objective is simply to prove that we can still do more.

We’ve already proved that.

The opportunity now is to decide what deserves the benefit of everything we’ve learned.

Your First Business Decision

If you’re considering turning your experience into an independent income stream, don’t begin by listing every service you could offer.

Begin with a blank page and answer these questions:

• How much income do I want this business to generate?

• How many hours a week do I want to work?

• What kind of work do I genuinely want to spend those hours doing?

• What responsibilities am I no longer willing to carry?

• Does the business I’m considering actually support those answers?

Then look at your experience and decide how to put it to work.

You don’t need to have every detail figured out before you begin.

But you do need to understand what you’re trying to build.

Otherwise, you risk spending the next few years becoming exceptionally good at a business you never really wanted.

And after everything you’ve already accomplished, that would be a rather expensive way to discover you made the wrong decision.

An invitation

On Thursday, 12th of November 2026, I’m hosting a small, live Second Act Blueprint Workshop for women who want to explore how their professional experience can become the foundation of a business of their own.

We’ll work through the early decisions together, including the experience you want to use, the problems you’re equipped to solve and the direction you want your business to take.

It’s a two-hour online workshop, limited to 6–8 women, so there’s room to think, ask questions and work through your ideas.

For this first workshop, I’m offering an introductory price of $129, including The Second Act Blueprint. Future workshops are planned at $195.

Registration opens shortly. If you’d like to be among the first to receive the details, simply reply to this email with Workshop, and I’ll be in touch.

When I finally decided to build my own business, the conversation in my head was not philosophical.

It was direct: “So start the bloody business.”

By then I had made thousands of decisions. Some affected an entire company, its employees, its customers and its future. Quite often I made them without all the information I would have liked. That is part of being responsible for something. You assess what you know, weigh the consequences, trust your judgement and decide. Sometimes you get it right. Sometimes you only find out much later.

I have never believed good leadership means always having the right answer. It means being willing to make the decision, take responsibility for it and change course when the evidence tells you to.

What fascinates me is how differently we do this when the decision concerns our own lives.

When the decision is yours

I have helped build businesses for much of my career. Building my own feels entirely different.

This time, I’m it!

There is no management team, no employees and no organisation around me. I am not working towards changing that either. It is exactly what I decided I wanted. A one-woman business. If I need specialist help, I will bring in someone independent for the work. I want to use the technology available to us, including AI, and build something digital that eventually generates income without needing my constant presence.

Not just enough to pay the bills, but a business that supports the life I want to live. One where income and working hours are no longer permanently tied together.

I know this does not happen overnight. It takes work, experimentation and a willingness to find out that some of your ideas are not as good as you thought. But the decision about what I wanted to build was clear from the start.

That is the biggest difference between this business and those I have helped build before. I am no longer starting with what an organisation needs from me. I am starting with what I want my life to look like.

The decisions that don’t appear on a business plan

Some of my harder decisions recently have had very little to do with business.

I have decided to step away from relationships that no longer have a healthy place in my life. I have become much more selective about where I spend my time and who I spend it with. And I have decided to stop accepting responsibilities simply because I am capable of handling them.

That last one has taken some getting used to.

Professionally, saying no has never been difficult for me. I have always been comfortable setting boundaries, challenging decisions and explaining why something is not going to happen.

Privately, it has been a different story.

I have said yes when I wanted to say no. I have taken on things I did not want to do. I have made room for other people’s needs when I should have been paying attention to my own.

And I know I am not alone in that. Almost every woman I speak to has, at some point, told me the same.

It is remarkable how easily we get used to arrangements that no longer work for us. Nobody is forcing us to stay. Changing them just feels more uncomfortable than continuing.

Until, eventually, it doesn’t.

I am still living with some of these decisions. Others are works in progress. Deciding to do something does not mean the circumstances fall into place. But I no longer confuse a decision with a guarantee. I can be certain of the direction without knowing exactly how or when I will get there.

The decision you already know about

Most of us spend more time looking for reassurance than asking what we actually want.

We tell ourselves we need more information, more time, a better plan, a little more certainty. Sometimes we do. But often we are postponing a decision because we understand what making it would require of us.

Perhaps it is a career you have outgrown. A business you have wanted to start. A responsibility you no longer want to carry. A life that looks perfectly fine from the outside but no longer feels right to you.

I can’t tell you which decision to make. Nor would I want to.

But you know which one I mean.

Make the decision. Then make something of it.

There’s a particular satisfaction in finally having something of your own to sell.

You’ve taken years of experience, thought carefully about where you can make a difference, and turned that knowledge into something tangible. A consulting service, a digital product, a workshop, or a programme. Something with a name, a price, and a purpose.

You’ve probably spent more time refining it than you originally intended. The description has been rewritten, the price reconsidered, and the website adjusted until you can barely remember what the first version looked like.

But eventually, you decide it’s ready. You publish it, make sure everything works, and enjoy that lovely feeling of having brought something of your own into the world.

And then you discover that creating something valuable and getting someone to buy it are two rather different things.

It’s an interesting adjustment. Especially when you’ve spent decades working in environments where your expertise already had an established place. People knew what you did, understood your responsibilities, and came to you because they needed a problem solved. Your experience had an established context. Much of your professional reputation had been built within it.

Now you’re building that context for yourself.

The experience is still there, but the woman who needs it doesn’t know you exist. Even when she finds you, she may not immediately understand why what you’ve created is relevant to her.

That’s where having an offer begins to become a business.

She Isn’t Buying Your Experience. She’s Buying What It Can Do for Her

One of the things I find particularly interesting about building a business around your own experience is how easily we assume its value will be obvious.

We’ve spent years developing our judgement, solving difficult problems, and learning what works. We know what we’re capable of, and we have plenty of evidence to support it. But the woman considering our offer hasn’t lived through those years with us. And she doesn’t need to.

What she needs to understand is how that experience relates to something she’s trying to achieve or resolve in her own life.

Your professional background helps establish credibility, but the buying decision happens when she recognises her problem in what you’re describing and can see how your offer will help her move forward.

Your experience gives you credibility.

Her problem gives your offer relevance.

You don’t need to explain everything you’ve ever done to demonstrate your value. You need to make the connection between what you know and what she needs clear enough that she can recognise it for herself.

If that connection isn’t immediately apparent, examine how you’re presenting the offer before questioning the value of what you’ve created.

Appreciation Is Lovely. Demand Tells You Something Different

There’s another adjustment that deserves attention, especially if you’re building your business through writing, relationships, or an existing professional network.

People can genuinely appreciate your ideas without having any intention of buying from you. They can enjoy your articles, agree with your observations, and tell you how much they value your perspective. And those relationships matter. Trust doesn’t appear overnight, and I wouldn’t want to build a business where every conversation was treated as a potential transaction.

A purchase tells us that a person has recognised a problem, believes our offer can help, and considers the price worthwhile. It gives us a different kind of evidence from a compliment, a recommendation, or an encouraging comment.

That doesn’t mean one sale proves we have a sustainable business. It means we’ve learned something useful about the relationship between the problem, the offer, and the customer.

And when sales aren’t happening, we need to be just as thoughtful about what that tells us.

It’s tempting to assume the product needs improving, the price needs changing, or the entire idea needs reconsidering. But an offer can be perfectly relevant and still struggle because too few of the right people have encountered it. It can reach the right audience but fail to communicate its value clearly. Or it can attract genuine interest from people who don’t consider the problem important enough to pay to solve right now.

Before you change your offer, understand whether the problem is:

· What you’re selling

· How you’re explaining it

· Who you’re reaching

That distinction can save an extraordinary amount of time, particularly when you’re building a business alongside everything else in your life.

The Offer Needs to Be Seen, Not Just Created

I think many experienced women are far more comfortable demonstrating what they know than inviting someone to buy something from them.

We’re used to being useful. We share ideas, answer questions, contribute to conversations, and help people see situations differently. Those things come naturally after years of working with others, and they’re an excellent foundation for building trust.

But somewhere between sharing our expertise and introducing a paid offer, we can become surprisingly discreet.

We mention the product once, perhaps when it launches, and then return to our usual conversations. We don’t want to sound pushy, and we certainly don’t want every interaction to become a sales pitch. So we assume that anyone who’s interested will find their way to what we’re offering.

Unfortunately, people have rather busy lives. They don’t necessarily remember an announcement from three weeks ago. They aren’t always going to investigate whether the woman whose writing they enjoy also has something they can buy.

You don’t need to sell in every conversation. But you do need to make it reasonably easy for the right person to discover what you offer, understand what it does, and decide whether it’s for her.

Otherwise, you risk becoming very good at building an audience that has no idea you’re also building a business.

And that is a rather expensive form of modesty 😂

Give One Good Offer a Proper Chance

When you’ve created something and the response is quieter than you’d hoped, it’s remarkably easy to find yourself planning the next thing.

A smaller product might be easier to sell. A workshop could attract more interest. Perhaps a different programme would appeal to another audience. And while you’re considering those possibilities, there’s always the website to improve.

Before long, you’ve created an impressive amount of work without learning very much about why the original offer hasn’t sold.

I understand the attraction. Creating something new feels productive. There’s energy in developing an idea, making decisions, and watching something take shape. Finding out whether people actually want to buy it requires a different kind of patience.

But this is where I’d encourage you to stay with one offer long enough to learn from it.

Give the right people a genuine opportunity to encounter it. Talk about the problem it solves and pay attention to the language they use when describing that problem themselves. Notice what they understand immediately, what they question, and where their interest seems to fade.

If someone buys, learn what helped her decide. If someone doesn’t, don’t assume you know why.

Over time, those conversations give you a much better basis for deciding what to change, what to keep, and where to focus your attention. You don’t need to build an elaborate sales system before you understand what works. You need a clear offer, a way to reach the right people, and enough evidence to make informed decisions.

Once you’ve found a way to generate sales, you can begin making that process more consistent without creating another full-time job for yourself. And that’s an important consideration if the whole point of building your own business was to have greater control over your time.

The Work That Comes After Creating

I think there’s something worth acknowledging about this stage of building a business.

You can have decades of experience, excellent judgement, and a strong understanding of how businesses work, and still find yourself learning how to sell something under your own name.

There’s no contradiction in that. You’re working in a different context, with different relationships, and a different kind of responsibility for making things happen.

The experience you’ve accumulated is an enormous advantage, but it doesn’t remove the need to understand your market, communicate clearly, and learn what turns interest into a buying decision.

And I wouldn’t rush past that learning by constantly creating something new.

If you already have an offer, take a good look at what’s happening around it:

· Can the right woman find it?

· Does she recognise the problem it solves?

· Is the value clear, and have you given her a straightforward way to buy?

· Most importantly, do you have enough evidence to know what needs your attention next?

Because the objective isn’t simply to make a sale and celebrate, although I certainly wouldn’t discourage the celebration. 🥂

It’s to understand what made that sale possible, so you can begin creating the conditions for another.

Having something worth selling is a good beginning. Learning how to bring it to the right people is what turns it into a business.

Still working out what your offer should be?

If you’re at the earlier stage of translating your experience into something of your own, The Second Act Blueprint helps you examine what you know, identify where it creates value, and begin shaping that into a clear offer.

It’s designed to help you do the thinking that comes before taking an offer to market.

👉 Explore The Second Act Blueprint.

I’ve been thinking about how much of our lives we continue to organise around decisions we made years ago. Not necessarily the big, life-changing ones, but all those smaller decisions that gradually became part of who we are. The responsibilities we accepted, the expectations we agreed to meet and the things we took on because they made perfect sense at the time.

And then, somewhere along the way, we changed. Our interests shifted, our ambitions evolved and things that once mattered enormously became less important. We began wanting something different from our days, our work and even from ourselves. Yet somehow, much of our lives continued to run according to the original plan.

It’s rather extraordinary when you think about it. We can spend years developing as people while continuing to make decisions based on a woman we haven’t been for quite some time.

When being good at something becomes the reason you keep doing it

I spent more than 25 years in leadership and executive roles, making decisions, solving problems and taking responsibility. I loved the complexity of it. Give me a difficult situation and my brain will start rearranging the pieces before anyone has finished explaining the problem. It still does, whether I’ve been invited to help or not.

For years, that instinct served me well. But it also taught me to step in whenever I knew the answer, often before considering whether the problem was actually mine to solve. I’ve since learned that knowing what to do and being the person who needs to do it are two very different things.

You know this feeling. You’ve spent years becoming the person everyone can rely on. Your judgement is trusted, your experience is valued and people know you’ll find a way forward. It’s a reputation you’ve earned, and one you have every reason to be proud of.

But there’s a catch. The better you become at handling things, the more people bring you. And the more you accept, the less anyone, including you, questions whether you still want that responsibility.

You can become so good at being the person everyone needs that you forget to consider what you need yourself.

The expectations we helped create

Other people don’t necessarily keep up when our priorities change. They still see the woman they’ve always known.

To be fair, we’ve spent years giving them every reason to think that way.

I still catch myself mentally working through a solution to a problem that nobody has actually asked me to solve. It’s almost impressive how quickly I can turn someone else’s situation into my own responsibility.

These days, I listen first. Even when I know exactly how I’d handle a situation, I don’t rush to provide the answer. I’ve learned to be the last person to speak rather than the first. It gives other people the opportunity to think, take responsibility and find their own solutions.

Try this the next time someone brings you a problem, whether it’s at work, at home or with someone you love. Before offering your solution, ask what they’ve already considered and what they think needs to happen. Then listen.

It’s particularly difficult with the people we love. We want to help, protect them from making mistakes and save them the trouble of figuring everything out themselves. And when we can see the solution so clearly, keeping quiet requires a surprising amount of self-discipline.

But here’s what I’ve learned. People don’t always need your answer, even when it’s a good one. Sometimes they need to talk things through, make their own decisions or simply know you’re listening.

You can care deeply about someone without taking responsibility for solving their problems.

Changing that habit has made me realise something else. The expectations we live under aren’t always imposed by other people. We are the ones keeping them alive.

You probably still have people around you who expect you to be the woman you’ve always been. But how often are you expecting exactly the same thing from yourself?

The cost of continuing as before

I’m proud of the woman who worked hard, raised a family, built a career and took on responsibilities that weren’t always easy. Those years shaped me, and I wouldn’t erase them.

Some of the most meaningful changes in my own life haven’t involved dramatic decisions. They’ve come from recognising what I no longer want to spend my time doing.

An opportunity can look excellent on paper and still be completely wrong for the life I want today. A responsibility can be well within my capabilities without being something I want to accept. And something I would once have dismissed as unproductive can turn out to be precisely how I want to spend an afternoon.

I still have to remind myself of that last one occasionally. Apparently, decades of being productive don’t disappear simply because you’ve decided to become a little more sensible about your time 😅

But there’s a cost to continuing as before, and it’s not always obvious.

You can have a full calendar, a successful career and a life that looks perfectly good from the outside, while having very little room for the things that now matter most to you. The cost isn’t necessarily that something goes wrong. It’s that everything continues to work well enough for you never to question it.

The woman making your decisions today

At 55, I’m very aware that time is the one thing I can’t earn back. I’ve spent enough years filling my days with things that needed doing. Now I’m far more interested in making sure there’s room for the things I actually want to do. And that requires making some decisions differently, even when the old way would be easier.

Today I ask these questions before taking on something that requires my time, energy or commitment. They’re simple, but the answers aren’t always comfortable.

1. Is this actually my responsibility?
   Or have I taken it on because I’m the person who usually gets things done?

2. Would I choose this today?

   Forget what made sense ten or twenty years ago. Does it still make sense for the life I want now?

3. What am I saying no to by saying yes?

   Every commitment takes time from somewhere. What am I giving up by agreeing?

4. Do I want this, or do I just want to be seen as someone who does it?

   There’s a difference between making a conscious choice and maintaining a reputation.

5. What would I advise someone I care about to do?

   We’re often much better at recognising what other people need than applying the same judgement to our own lives.

You don’t need to question every little decision. But the ones that determine how you spend your days deserve more than an automatic yes.

The woman you were twenty years ago made decisions based on the life she was building then. Those decisions served their purpose.

Now make sure the woman you are today gets a say.

The mountain is already under your feet.

But knowing the mountain is there does not tell you what to do with it. It is a comforting realisation. It is not yet a strategy.

When you sit down at your kitchen table to work out what comes next, whether that is a consulting practice, an advisory business or something entirely your own, you tend to hit a very specific roadblock.

You try to drag your old container into your new future.

You look at your past job titles, your industry language and the responsibilities you used to hold, and try to work out which parts someone would actually pay you for.

The market isn’t buying your former position or the list of responsibilities attached to it. People pay for the problems you can solve and the results you can help them achieve.

Your title describes the position you held. It doesn’t capture the judgement you developed, the patterns you learned to recognise or the problems you became exceptionally good at solving.

That is the part we need to translate.

The Three Columns of Translation

Start by separating your experience into three parts: the position you held, the expertise you developed and the problem that expertise can solve for someone else.

Put them into three columns.

1. The Old Container
   What your old CV, title or industry description says. The corporate box you used to work inside.

2. The Raw Material
   Your unfair advantage. The judgement, the pattern recognition or the strategic muscle you developed while you were inside that box.

3. The Second Act Application
   How that raw material solves a costly, pressing problem for a specific client today.

Let’s imagine you’ve spent years in operations. You’ve managed people, budgets, deadlines and all the things that come with keeping a business running.

Then one day, a founder tells you she’s exhausted. Her business is growing, but every decision still lands on her desk. Her team is busy, yet nothing seems to move without her involvement.

You recognise the problem almost immediately.

You’ve seen what happens when a business grows faster than the structure supporting it. You know where to look, which questions to ask and how to find out what’s actually causing the bottlenecks.

Now look at what’s happened.

You haven’t offered to become her Head of Operations. You haven’t listed your former responsibilities or presented your CV.

You’ve recognised a problem she wants solved, using judgement you developed over years of doing the work.

And that is something she can pay you to help her solve.

The same principle applies whether you’ve spent your career in finance, communications, human resources, technology or something entirely different.

Perhaps you’re the person who can read a complicated financial situation and immediately see where the numbers don’t add up. Or you’ve spent years helping people navigate difficult decisions, and you know how to get a conversation moving when everyone else has reached a standstill.

The expertise is different. So are the people who need it.

Finding Your Unfair Advantage

Now comes the part that is often harder than it looks: recognising your own unfair advantage.

Over time, experience becomes instinct. You recognise patterns, make connections and spot problems without consciously working through every step. What once required considerable effort now feels perfectly ordinary.

That’s why your own expertise can be surprisingly difficult to recognise. You’ve become so accustomed to using it that you no longer notice how much judgement sits behind it.

Ease is your evidence.

To find the raw material on your own mountain, ask yourself three questions you might normally skip past:

1. What do you find genuinely easy that others seem to struggle with?

2. What did people regularly come to you for that was nowhere in your official job description?

3. If a former colleague described your real strength in one sentence, what would they say?

Then try to write it as one line: My unfair advantage is…

On its own, that line is a sentence, not a plan. But it is the first honest piece of ground you can build on.

Now take that sentence one step further. Identify who has a problem your expertise can solve, what that problem is, and what would change for them if you solved it.

From Experience to Offer

You now have more than a description of what you’re good at. You’ve begun to identify who needs that expertise and what they would pay you to help them solve.

But there is still work between recognising an opportunity and turning it into an offer someone can actually buy.

That’s where The Second Act Blueprint comes in.

The Second Act Blueprint is a strategy toolkit you work through at your own pace. It takes you through the same five questions I work through with women one to one: where you stand, who you serve, what you sell, how they find you, and what you do first.

You start with your unfair advantage. You finish with a one-page plan for your second act and a practical 90-day plan you can actually act on.

I made it because it is exactly what I needed in my own early days, and could not find anywhere.

It costs $59. Take a look at the Blueprint here.

The purchase and submission deadlines are 11:59 PM Eastern Time.

And if you are not ready for any of that yet, that is fine too. Whether you are building, considering or simply following along, try the third question. Then hit reply and tell me what your former colleague would say. I read every reply.

We treat a new chapter like a blank piece of paper.

We sit down with a clean notebook, a fresh screen, and a quiet sense of panic. We look ahead and ask ourselves one of the most exhausting questions available: What on earth am I going to create from scratch?

So we start searching. New ideas, directions, qualifications. Even new business models. Something interesting enough, different enough, perhaps impressive enough to become whatever comes next.

There is only one problem.

The blank page is an illusion.

You are not standing at the bottom of a mountain wondering how you’re going to climb it. You are already standing on years of accumulated judgement, hard-won instincts, mistakes you paid for, problems you learned to solve and patterns you can now recognise almost before they appear.

The mountain is already under your feet.

And that is surprisingly easy to miss.

When Expertise Stops Looking Like Expertise

There is a strange thing that happens when you’ve been good at something for long enough: it stops looking particularly special from where you’re standing.

You untangle something in an afternoon that has kept someone else stuck for weeks. You hear three minutes of a conversation and know what the real problem is. You can look at a plan and immediately see the part that isn’t going to work.

None of it feels extraordinary. You aren’t performing magic. You’re simply doing what you know how to do.

So you discount it.

Of course I can do that. That’s obvious.

But obvious to whom?

What feels instinctive today is often the result of hundreds of decisions, mistakes, conversations and situations you no longer remember individually. The struggle has disappeared, but the learning hasn’t.

Ease is the evidence.

The problem is that familiarity is very good at disguising expertise. Stand on the same ground for long enough and eventually you stop seeing the mountain. It just feels like where you happen to be standing.

Your Job Was Doing More Work Than You Realised

There is another reason this becomes difficult when you start thinking about a Second Act.

For years, your expertise had a container.

A job title. A company. An industry. A team. Clients. Responsibilities. Problems arrived at your desk already attached to a context, and everyone around you understood why you were the person expected to deal with them.

The container made your value legible.

Then you step outside it.

Suddenly the title is gone. The organisation isn’t there to explain what you’re for. The familiar problems aren’t arriving automatically any more.

And something peculiar happens.

A woman can leave a substantial career carrying everything she learned from it and still sit at her kitchen table wondering what she has that anybody would pay for.

Nothing disappeared.

The container did.

If you believe your expertise disappeared with the role, you’ll naturally start trying to replace it. You’ll search for the next qualification, the next idea, the next identity or the next piece of proof.

You’ll keep adding when the real work is something else entirely.

Stop Accumulating. Start Translating

A Second Act does not require you to drag the old container into the future.

It requires you to separate what was valuable inside it from the structure that used to hold it.

Your job title is not your expertise. Your industry is not your expertise. Even the list of things you were responsible for is not necessarily your expertise.

Those were the places where your value was expressed.

The more interesting question is what was underneath them.

The judgement that made people trust you with the difficult situation. The ability to see structure inside a mess and recognise the problem beneath the problem. The combination of things you learned in completely different places that now allows you to see something another person misses.

That is where the raw material sits.

And no, finding it does not mean you should package every capability you’ve ever developed and sell it back to the world. Some things deserve to stay exactly where you left them. Being good at something has never been a good enough reason to build your future around it.

But you cannot choose what belongs in your next chapter while you’re still confusing the container with what was valuable inside it.

You are playing a game of accumulation when you should be playing a game of translation.

Translation is the work of taking expertise that made perfect sense in one world and learning to see what it could become in another.

That is not starting over.

It is starting with evidence.

The Mountain Was Never the Problem

Perhaps that’s why the blank page feels so intimidating. You’re staring at it as though the answer has to come from somewhere you haven’t been yet.

It doesn’t.

The first job is to learn how to see what you’re already standing on. The raw material isn’t missing. The mountain is already under your feet.

Once you can see it, a much more useful question appears: How do you take all of that accumulated experience out of its old container and translate it into something that belongs to what comes next?

That’s where we’ll go on Thursday. Not in theory. In practice.

Until then, I’d love to know: What’s one thing people have always come to you for that you’ve never thought of as expertise?

And now you want to build something of your own, so you sit down in front of a blank page and ask: What could I possibly build a business around?

Come on 😂

You are behaving as though none of what came before counts because you have not yet turned it into a business. You are telling yourself you need a business idea.

Nope. You need an inventory.

What feels obvious to you often is not obvious at all. You have simply done it enough times that you no longer notice the expertise involved. Look at what people already come to you for. The problem they ask you to untangle. The decision they want your opinion on. The thing you can see quickly that they cannot.

That is worth paying attention to.

Before you decide what comes next, determine what does not

When I am working with a woman who is trying to figure out what comes next, I never begin with What do you want? It is a perfectly reasonable question. It is also surprisingly good at making an intelligent woman stare at me as though I have just asked her to explain quantum physics.

I ask: What don’t you want anymore?

That is usually when I have to start writing quickly.

No more managing a huge team. No more being permanently available. No more internal politics. No more selling every hour. No more travelling constantly. No more being responsible for absolutely everything simply because everyone knows she can handle it.

She knows.

Every NO tells us something. We are eliminating the work, responsibilities, and structure she does not want to carry into whatever comes next.

Your problem probably is not that you can do too little. You can do too much. We do not need more possibilities. We need fewer.

This is where it gets interesting. You may discover that you do not actually hate the work. You hate the machinery around it.

You do not want to manage a team anymore, but you love developing people. You are done with the politics, but complicated business problems still light you up. You do not want responsibility for the entire operation, but you could happily spend all day on strategy.

Now we are getting somewhere. You are separating what you still want from everything that came wrapped around it.

Please do not skip this part and jump straight to the obvious business. HR becomes HR consulting. Marketing becomes marketing consulting. Finance becomes fractional CFO.

Maybe.

But we are not rebuilding the job you want to leave and calling it freedom.

The market will happily pay you for the woman you have already been. That does not mean you owe it another ten years of her.

Your experience is raw material. You decide what comes with you.

Your title is not the interesting part

Your career tells me what you have done. I am more interested in what doing it taught you to see.

A title might say CFO. The real value might be an ability to take complicated numbers and turn them into a decision someone can actually make. The title is just the container.

Look underneath yours. Where have you developed a point of view you are willing to defend? Put that answer next to everything you have already decided you do not want.

What is left?

That is a much more interesting place to start. We are not trying to monetise your entire career. We are looking for the pieces worth carrying forward.

And no, experience is not valuable just because you have accumulated a lot of it.

Your impressive CV is NOT an invoice.

It becomes commercially interesting when what you know changes something for somebody else. You help them see what they cannot see, solve something faster, avoid an expensive mistake, make a better decision, or get somewhere without taking all the detours you took.

Now we are having a business conversation.

Your buyer does not need your entire career. She needs the part that helps her.

That part might have been 10% of your old role. It can become 80% of what you build next. Something you did one-to-one might become a method. A problem you repeatedly solved internally might become an offer. You can change the buyer, the problem, the delivery, and the business model.

Your career is not the product. It is where you collected the raw material.

Make the list backwards

If you are trying to work out what comes next, do not begin by demanding an answer to the enormous question: What do I want to do now?

Make the list backwards.

• What I don’t want: You already know more of this than you think. Write it down without negotiating with yourself.

• What I want to keep: Which parts of your work still interest you? Which problems do you still enjoy solving? What knowledge are you nowhere near finished using?

• What creates value for someone else: Where can what you know, see, or solve make a meaningful, commercial difference?

Look at the overlap.

Not everything there should become a business. But now you are no longer trying to invent one from thin air. You are working with what you have already proved, what you still want, and what somebody else actually values.

The thing you are looking for may not need to be invented. It may need to be recognised.

The blank page is not empty. You are just looking at the wrong page.

If you are looking at everything you have accumulated and thinking, I know there is something here, but I still cannot see how to turn it into something of my own, that is exactly why I created The Second Act Blueprint.

It helps you sort through what you have built, what you want to leave behind, and what is worth carrying forward, then start turning that into an income stream that fits the life you want now. Read about the Blueprint here.

You do not need another blank page. Start with what is already there.

Not where you live, whether you’ve paid off the mortgage or how much is sitting in your pension. Not the soft-focus version of you in a linen shirt, drinking tea in a beautiful garden and looking remarkably good for your age. I mean you. The woman herself.

What is she like?

Does she still get excited about things? Is she curious? Does she trust herself? Can she laugh at the mistakes that once kept her awake at night? Has she stopped comparing herself with women she never really wanted to be in the first place? Does she still have strong opinions, change her mind, try things she isn’t very good at and occasionally make decisions that surprise the people who thought they had her figured out?

And does she like the woman she became?

It’s a different question from asking what you want to have achieved by 80. We are good at thinking in those terms. The career. The business. Financial security. The house. The places we want to see. The things we still want to accomplish. All of that matters, but achievement tells you what you have accumulated. It doesn’t necessarily tell you very much about the woman who accumulated it.

So perhaps there is another way to look at the life you’re creating.

Imagine yourself at 80 and look backwards.

She already knows how this turns out

The woman at 80 knows things you don’t know yet.

She knows what happened with your career. She knows whether you built the business, took the promotion, stayed another ten years or eventually walked away. She knows whether you made the money you’re working so hard for and whether it bought what you hoped it would. She knows which relationships lasted, which ones changed, who surprised you and who you eventually had to let go.

She also knows what happened to the decisions that frighten you today.

Think about one of them.

Perhaps you’re doing work you’re exceptionally good at, but you’ve known for some time that you don’t want to spend the rest of your working life doing it. Maybe there is something else you keep thinking about, but it would mean giving up certainty, status or income. Perhaps you want to build something of your own. Maybe you want to grow what you’ve already built and you’re frightened by the size of your ambition. Or perhaps what you actually want is less, and admitting that feels strangely harder than wanting more.

From where you are standing now, you have years of evidence telling you what makes sense. Experience accumulated. Salary earned. Reputation built. People depending on you. Commitments made. There may be very good reasons to stay exactly where you are.

But your 80-year-old self is holding a different set of accounts.

She knows what staying cost you too.

That doesn’t mean she would tell you to leave. Maybe staying will turn out to be one of the best decisions you ever made. Looking at your life from the other end isn’t a clever way of giving yourself permission to do something reckless.

It does something much more useful.

It doesn’t tell you to be braver. It asks you to be more truthful.

Are you staying because you genuinely want to stay, or because leaving frightens you? Are you saying yes because you want the opportunity, or because being wanted still feels a little too much like being valuable? Are you working this hard because the work matters deeply to you, or because you’ve become so good at carrying responsibility that nobody, including you, has thought to ask whether you still want to carry quite so much of it?

Only you know.

But I suspect the woman at 80 will.

Some of the safest decisions have very good disguises

Fear and guilt rarely walk into the room and announce themselves when intelligent women make important decisions. They’re much cleverer than that.

They sound like responsibility. Loyalty. Timing. Prudence. Being realistic. They remind you how much you’ve already invested, how many people depend on you and how foolish it would be to disturb something that is working perfectly well. Sometimes they’re right. Responsibility is real, money matters and other people don’t disappear simply because we’ve decided to become more intentional about our lives.

But there is a difference between considering other people and repeatedly abandoning yourself.

There is a difference between choosing security because it genuinely matters to you and choosing it because fear has made every alternative look irresponsible. There is a difference between loving people and needing to be needed by them. There is even a difference between being kind and saying yes because you can’t tolerate somebody being disappointed in you.

Those distinctions matter in business too. You can build a successful career because you’re excellent at the game and eventually discover you never particularly wanted the prize. You can create a business around what the market rewards and accidentally build yourself another job you don’t want. You can keep chasing more money while quietly trading away the independence you thought money was supposed to buy.

Money matters. A lot. Especially for women. It creates options, security and the ability to make decisions that don’t depend entirely on somebody else’s permission.

But independence is bigger than money.

It’s being able to decide who you are when nobody is applauding.

It’s knowing what you want when comparison isn’t doing the choosing for you.

And perhaps it’s being able to disappoint someone without automatically concluding that you’ve done something wrong.

The relationship you’re taking all the way to 80

This morning I heard a sentence that stopped me.

It came from Diane von Furstenberg, who turns 80 in a few months:

Sit with that for a moment.

Because whatever happens between now and 80, there is one woman who is coming with you.

You.

And perhaps that changes what self-belief means.

We often talk about self-belief as though it’s confidence that things will work out. Believe in yourself. Take the leap. Trust your gut. Lovely when printed on a mug, but not especially useful when you’re making a decision with real consequences.

What if self-belief isn’t knowing you’ll make the right decision?

What if it’s knowing you won’t abandon yourself when you make the wrong one?

Because you will make some wrong ones.

You’ll trust someone you shouldn’t. Stay too long. Leave too early. Spend money badly. Miss an opportunity. Build something that doesn’t work. Say something you wish you hadn’t. Perhaps you’ll spend three years pursuing something and eventually realise you don’t want it anymore.

At 80, do you want to be a woman who avoided all of that?

Or a woman who learned that getting something wrong didn’t make her wrong?

There is enormous freedom in that distinction. Your mistakes can become information rather than identity. You can learn without turning every wrong decision into another reason not to trust yourself. You can change your mind without treating the previous version of you with contempt for not knowing then what you know now.

Imagine carrying that relationship with yourself into 80.

What will have compounded because you were here?

Then there is the question of legacy.

It’s a word that can sound unnecessarily grand, particularly when you’re sitting at the kitchen table on a Tuesday with emails waiting and laundry that has shown absolutely no respect for your desire to contemplate the meaning of life.

But legacy doesn’t have to mean having your name on a building.

Look at the people around you.

Who has become more confident because you believed in her? Who became more independent because you loved them enough not to make yourself indispensable? Whose career changed because you opened a door? What knowledge did you pass on rather than protect as proof of your own importance? Who remembers that you were kind at a moment when there was absolutely nothing in it for you?

And what have you built?

Maybe it is a company. Maybe it’s wealth that gives your family choices you never had. Perhaps it’s work that matters, a book, a body of knowledge, a community, a home people love returning to or children who know they can stand on their own feet.

Kindness and ambition aren’t opposites.

Neither are independence and love.

Perhaps legacy is simply what has compounded because you were here.

We understand compounding when it comes to money. We talk about it considerably less when it comes to courage, generosity, knowledge, self-belief and kindness. Yet those things move from person to person too. Something you say to someone at 46 may influence a decision she makes at 52, which changes something for somebody you’ve never even met.

You may never know.

That doesn’t make it less real.

You don’t need to design her

So what kind of 80-year-old woman are you becoming?

I hope you don’t have a complete answer.

Imagine having another 20 or 30 years ahead of you and already knowing exactly who you’ll be at the end of them. How incredibly dull. 😂

I hope she surprises you.

I hope she has changed her mind about things you currently consider settled. I hope there are people around her you haven’t met yet. I hope she’s made mistakes you can’t currently imagine and recovered from them. I hope she has tried things you once thought weren’t for you and let go of a few things you were once certain defined you.

Maybe she’ll still be working. Maybe she’ll have built the business. Maybe she’ll be writing her third book, travelling somewhere you’ve never considered visiting or learning something she’s spectacularly bad at.

Perhaps she’ll be quieter than you are now.

Perhaps she’ll be louder.

The point isn’t to design her today.

It’s to notice that you’re already creating the life she’ll eventually look back on.

So every now and then, perhaps it’s worth borrowing her chair and looking at your life from there.

Look at the work you’re doing. The money you’re making. The things you’re postponing. The people you love. The things you’re tolerating. The ambitions you’re hiding. The mistakes you’re still punishing yourself for. The kindness you’re putting into the world.

Then ask yourself whether they are taking you towards a woman you would actually like to meet.

Diane von Furstenberg turns 80 in three months. Listening to her this morning, what struck me wasn’t simply what she has achieved. It was the woman speaking about the life she had lived. The self-belief. The independence. The mistakes she was willing to own without allowing them to define her. The value she places on kindness. And the relationship she has built with herself through all of it.

It made me wonder what I’ll sound like when I’m 80.

I don’t need her answers to be mine.

But I would quite like to reach that age still unmistakably myself, only with another 25 years of living added.

And hopefully enough self-belief to have made a few questionable decisions along the way.

Otherwise, where’s the fun in making it to 80? 😂

Know a woman you’d like to be sitting beside at 80?
Send this to her.

Share

Give me a business idea and my brain will immediately start building the case for it. I’ll find the relevant experience, connect the dots, spot the commercial opportunity and probably start thinking about the positioning before I’ve decided whether I even want to do it. 😂

For most of my career, that instinct served me extremely well. Give me a problem and I would work out how to make it work.

It became considerably less useful when the problem I was trying to solve was my own future.

Consulting? I could make the case. Advisory work? Absolutely. Building something around my leadership experience? Plenty of evidence for that too.

After thirty years of working, I wasn’t short of credible options. I was dangerously good at making each of them sound like the right one.

And that’s where I think experience can play a trick on us. We assume that because we can build a convincing case for something, we’ve found a good reason to choose it.

We haven’t.

Being Able to Make It Work Is the Problem

An idea appears and something rather impressive happens. Within minutes, the experienced brain starts assembling the evidence. I’ve done something similar before. People already ask me about this. I know the industry. There must be a market for it. I could see how the offer would work.

Before long, a possibility has acquired a business model and we’re three Google searches away from checking whether the domain is available. 😂

This is especially tempting when you don’t yet know exactly what you want. A sensible option feels much better than an unanswered question, and we’re much more comfortable working out how to execute something than sitting with uncertainty.

But Could I make this work? and Do I want to make this mine? are not variations of the same question.

The first plays directly to everything we’ve spent decades learning to do. Solve the problem. Assess the opportunity. Find a route through. Make the pieces fit.

The second asks something much less familiar.

Do I actually want this?

The more capable you are of making an idea work, the less useful “Could I make this work?” becomes as a filter.

That’s a distinction I wish I’d understood much earlier.

A Good Argument Can Hide a Bad Decision

I noticed this in my own thinking. Whenever I considered a possible direction, I could almost immediately find the reasons it made sense. My experience supported it. I had credibility. I could see the market. I understood how I might position it.

Before long, I wasn’t exploring the idea anymore. I was defending it.

That’s a subtle shift, but an important one. Once we start defending an idea, we naturally notice the evidence in its favour. The fact that people already ask us for something becomes validation. The years we’ve spent doing it become proof. The fact that we could probably earn good money from it makes the argument even stronger.

None of that makes the evidence wrong. It simply means we’re answering one question very convincingly while potentially ignoring another.

Is this a real opportunity?

And:

Do I want this opportunity?

I’ve become much more interested in keeping those two questions separate.

Because a commercially sound idea can still be a terrible answer to what you want your work to become.

If It Works, You Get More of It

This may be the simplest test I’ve found.

When we evaluate an idea, we naturally imagine it working. Clients arrive. Revenue grows. The business becomes established.

Lovely.

But success is not only more money. If the business works, you also get more of the work it creates. More of those clients. More of those conversations. More of that particular problem to solve. More of whatever delivery model you’ve chosen. More of the responsibilities that come attached to it.

Success doesn’t remove the parts you don’t particularly want. It scales them too.

So instead of only asking Could this work?, I’ve started asking:

If this works, do I want more of what it creates?

Not just the revenue. The Tuesday afternoon.

What am I actually doing at 2.30 when this business is successful? Who am I talking to? What problem am I solving for the fiftieth time? What has filled my calendar? What am I now responsible for?

That question has a rather efficient way of making some excellent business ideas considerably less attractive.

And I like that.

I’d rather discover it while the business is still an idea.

Someone Will Probably Pay You to Repeat Yourself

There is another complication when you have a long career behind you. The market already knows how to value some of what you do.

If you’ve spent twenty years becoming very good at something, there is a reasonable chance somebody will pay you to continue doing it. Sometimes extremely well.

That is useful information.

It is not an instruction.

The market can tell you that an opportunity exists. It cannot tell you whether you want the life attached to it.

And this is where I think accomplished women can be particularly vulnerable. We have spent a long time being useful. We know the satisfaction of being good at something, being relied upon and being well paid for it.

When all three are present, walking away from an opportunity can look irrational.

But perhaps the opportunity doesn’t need a reason for us to say no. Perhaps it simply doesn’t get an automatic yes because we’re qualified for it.

Now Remove Your CV From the Argument

There is a question I keep coming back to when an idea looks particularly sensible:

If I couldn’t use my CV to justify this, would I still be interested in it?

Take away the title for a moment. Take away the years of experience, the credibility and the reassuring fact that you’ve done something similar before.

What’s left?

Maybe there’s still a problem you’re genuinely fascinated by. People you want to work with. A way of working you want more of. Something you’ve been quietly curious about for years.

Good. Now we’re getting somewhere.

But perhaps the idea becomes strangely flat without the evidence of how qualified you are to do it.

That’s useful too.

I’m not suggesting we throw thirty years of experience out of the window. That would be a rather spectacular waste of thirty years.

I want mine with me.

I just don’t want my past to win the argument simply because it has more evidence. It gets a seat at the table. It doesn’t get every vote.

Stop Defending the Idea

This has changed the way I look at possibilities.

Before I start working out how to build something, I want to see what happens when I stop trying to convince myself that it’s sensible.

Am I drawn to this, or am I simply very good at explaining why I should be? Would I still want it if nobody was impressed by it? If it became successful, would I want more of the work that success created?

And perhaps most importantly, does the idea become more interesting when I question it, or does it need me to keep defending it?

I don’t expect those questions to produce instant certainty. In fact, they can make things considerably messier for a while.

That’s fine.

A possibility doesn’t need to become a decision immediately. It can become a conversation. A small offer. A piece of work. Something you test with an actual person rather than continuing the argument inside your own head.

Because eventually, an idea needs evidence that you didn’t manufacture yourself.

You Don’t Have to Win the Argument

I think many of us approach what comes next as though we’re standing in front of an invisible board waiting to have our proposal approved. We want the story to make sense. We want to explain why our experience qualifies us, why the move is rational and why the numbers could work.

Perhaps that’s partly because, after decades of making responsible decisions, I want this can feel like surprisingly flimsy evidence.

So we build a stronger case.

But this isn’t a board meeting.

You don’t have to win the argument for your own future. You do have to examine it properly.

There should be evidence. If you’re building a business, there should eventually be a market. The idea needs to survive contact with people other than you.

But somewhere underneath all of that, there also has to be something you haven’t reasoned yourself into wanting. Something that is still there when you stop making the case for it.

And if you’re thinking, Fine, but how exactly do I separate what I genuinely want from the twenty perfectly sensible things I could do?, that is precisely the problem I found myself trying to solve.

I had plenty of experience. Plenty of possible directions. And, as we’ve established, absolutely no shortage of arguments for why any one of them could work. 😂

What I needed was a way to get underneath the obvious answers. To look at what I’d accumulated, notice the patterns I’d stopped seeing, separate what I was good at from what I wanted to keep doing, and begin testing what might actually be worth taking further.

Eventually, that work became The Second Act Blueprint.

I created it for the woman who knows there is something else she wants to do, has enough experience to come up with twenty perfectly sensible possibilities, and needs a way to work out which ones are actually hers.

It’s not going to hand you the answer. I don’t believe a workbook, coach or clever business framework can do that.

But it will help you stop arguing for every sensible possibility long enough to hear what else is there.

The Second Act Blueprint is $59. If you’ve recognised yourself anywhere in this article, I’d start here.

Leave a comment

It wasn’t a plan. I couldn’t even have told you exactly what I wanted. I just had a growing sense that there was more I wanted to do.

I would think about it occasionally, usually when life gave me enough room. Then work, family and everything else requiring my attention would take over again.

So I did what many of us do with something important that isn’t yet urgent.

I put it off.

I would come back to it when things were quieter. When I had more time. When I knew what I was actually looking for.

Except later has a way of moving with us.

Years can pass while we’re waiting for the right time to think seriously about something we can’t yet put into words. And somewhere along the way, the question changes.

It stops being What might I want to do someday?

And becomes How much longer am I willing to keep putting this off?

Sometimes the wanting comes before the knowing

For a long time, I assumed that if I really wanted something different, I would know what that something was.

I didn’t.

And I mistook that lack of an answer for a lack of direction.

That’s an easy mistake to make. We expect clarity to arrive first. Figure out what you want, then decide whether to pursue it.

But some of the most important questions don’t arrive with answers attached.

Not knowing what you want next doesn’t mean there is nothing there.
It means you haven’t explored it yet.

That distinction changed something for me.

I stopped asking myself to produce an answer I didn’t have and started paying attention to the fact that the question wouldn’t leave me alone.

The recurring thought was enough to begin.

Nothing has to be wrong

We find change much easier to justify when something is wrong.

A terrible boss. Work we hate. Burnout. Redundancy. A crisis. Something concrete enough to point at and say, See? This is why.

Pain gives us permission that desire often doesn’t.

But what if nothing is wrong?

You can be successful at what you do. Respected, well paid and very good at it. You can even enjoy it and still wonder whether you want to spend another ten years doing it.

That’s harder to explain. Especially to yourself.

Wanting something else can feel ungrateful when you’ve worked hard for what you already have. As though questioning it somehow diminishes everything that came before.

It doesn’t.

Wanting something else doesn’t make your current life wrong. It doesn’t make what you’ve built a mistake. And it certainly doesn’t mean you should resign tomorrow morning.

Sometimes “I want something different” is reason enough to start asking what different might mean.

I had been asking the wrong question

For a long time, mine was obvious:

What should I do next?

I eventually realised I was asking myself for a conclusion before I’d done the exploration.

No wonder I couldn’t answer it.

Almost anything could fit inside that question. Another job. Consulting. A business. Something completely different. I could keep generating possibilities without getting any closer to knowing which of them belonged to me.

So I stopped trying to name the next thing and started looking for evidence instead.

What from the life I’d already built did I want to take with me? What was I ready to leave behind? What still interested me enough to spend years on? What did I want my actual life to look like around the work this time?

Those questions didn’t suddenly hand me an answer.

They gave me something better to work with.

I wasn’t looking for the answer anymore. I was collecting the material from which an answer could emerge.

There is a lot of material after twenty or thirty years of working and living. Experience, interests, responsibilities, ambitions, things you’ve outgrown and things you haven’t even properly examined yet.

You don’t need to turn all of it into a plan immediately.

But you do need to start looking.

Maybe later has done its job

There were good reasons I put some things off.

There were years when other parts of my life needed more of me. Responsibilities I chose and responsibilities I didn’t. Things that genuinely mattered more at the time.

I don’t regret that.

But something being right to postpone once doesn’t mean it should be postponed forever.

Eventually, later can become a habit rather than a decision.

And perhaps that’s the part we don’t notice.

We tell ourselves we haven’t decided yet because we’re still thinking. Still busy. Still waiting for the right time.

But every time we say later without deciding when later is, we’re making a decision too.

We’re deciding not now.

Maybe you’re reading this from a job you could easily do for another ten years. Maybe someone else has just made the decision for you and you’re wondering whether you really want another version of the job you had. Maybe you’ve already started exploring something new but haven’t quite admitted how much you want it.

You don’t need to know the answer yet.

You don’t need a business idea, a resignation letter or a perfectly articulated vision for the next ten years.

But if the same thought keeps returning, perhaps it deserves more than another promise that you’ll come back to it later.

Because at some point, the question is no longer whether you know exactly what you want.

It’s whether you’re finally willing to find out.

So, when you start thinking about building something of your own, the usual advice makes perfect sense. Start with what you know. Look at what you’re already good at. Find the problem people will pay you to solve. Package your expertise and sell it.

It’s sensible advice. And for someone with decades of experience behind her, it can also lead you straight back into the work you were trying to leave.

The market knows what you’ve proved

Imagine you’ve spent years in a senior role. You’re good at what you do, but you’re ready for something different. Perhaps you want more control over your time. Perhaps you want to work with different people or on different problems. Perhaps you simply don’t want the next ten years to look like the last ten.

Then someone calls. They have a problem you’ve solved many times before. They know your reputation. They trust your judgement. And they’re willing to pay you very well to help them.

It’s difficult to think of a more convincing piece of commercial validation. So you say yes. Then somebody recommends you to somebody else. Another project arrives. Then another.

Six months later, you have a business.

From the outside, it looks like a very successful transition. You took your expertise, found a market for it and replaced at least some of your old income.

There is only one problem. You’re spending your days doing much the same work you were trying to move away from. Only now you send the invoices too.

The market hasn’t done anything wrong. It is responding rationally to the evidence you’ve spent decades creating. If you’ve led transformations for twenty years, that’s credible. If you’ve built teams, fixed operational problems, advised boards, grown businesses or developed deep expertise in a particular field, a buyer can understand what she’s buying from you. The closer the work sits to what you’ve already proved, the less risk she has to take.

But you and the buyer are answering two very different questions. She is asking whether you can solve her problem. You need to ask whether you want solving that problem to become your work again.

The market is very good at telling you what it values from your past. It cannot tell you whether you want to spend your future doing it.

Commercial validation can feel a lot like direction

I think this is particularly easy to miss when you’re building something after a long career. Starting again in any form introduces uncertainty. Even when you have enormous confidence in your abilities, you don’t yet have the same evidence for the new thing that you have for the old one.

Then someone offers to pay you for something you already know you can do. Suddenly there is proof. The idea is viable. The market wants it. Revenue is possible. Of course, that feels significant.

But demand is evidence of value. It isn’t evidence of direction.

I’ve had to confront this in building my own business. There are several things I could sell based on thirty years of experience. I could build perfectly credible offers around work I’ve done for years. There are problems I know how to solve, environments I understand and capabilities I could turn into revenue relatively quickly.

For a while, I treated that as an advantage without questioning it very much. Then I realised something slightly uncomfortable. I could build a commercially successful business around work I no longer wanted to spend my days doing.

Technically, I would have created something of my own. In practice, I could have rebuilt parts of the working life I was trying to change.

That forced me to make a distinction I hadn’t made clearly enough before. I don’t need to leave thirty years of experience behind. But I don’t need to keep performing every capability I’ve accumulated either.

Experience can be raw material without becoming the specification.

Just because you can sell it doesn’t mean you should

This is where I think the usual question, What could I sell?, becomes inadequate for experienced women. It’s still an important question. A business needs customers. What you offer needs to solve a problem someone values enough to pay for. But commercial viability is only one filter.

There are at least two others.

The first is whether you actually want to keep doing the work. Not whether you’re good at it. Not whether people praise you for it. Not whether you’ve spent twenty years becoming exceptional at it. Would you deliberately choose to spend a meaningful part of the next five or ten years doing it? Those are not the same question.

The second is what happens to your life when you sell it. You may love strategic work but have no desire to become embedded in another organisation five days a week. You may love teaching but not want a calendar containing twenty individual clients. You may enjoy advising leaders but have no interest in taking responsibility for implementation.

The expertise may be right while the way you’ve chosen to monetise it is completely wrong for the working life you’re trying to create.

I think we underestimate this when we talk about turning expertise into a business. We spend a great deal of time asking whether an offer works for the buyer. It also has to work for the person who keeps delivering it.

Otherwise, you can build something profitable and discover that you’ve become an employee of a business you happen to own.

Your past is an asset, not an instruction

None of this is an argument for walking away from what you know. Quite the opposite. If you’ve spent decades accumulating expertise, judgement, relationships and evidence, ignoring all of it in the name of starting fresh would make very little sense to me.

You are not starting from zero. But neither should you carry everything forward simply because you spent thirty years acquiring it.

The work is becoming much more selective. What do I know that creates genuine value? Which problems do I still care enough about to keep solving? Which parts of my experience do I want to become known for now? And if I turn those things into an offer, what kind of working life will be delivering that offer create?

You may end up selling something very close to the work you’ve always done. Wonderful. But this time it will be because you chose it, not simply because the market recognised it first.

And I think that is a much more interesting starting point for an experienced woman than simply asking what she can monetise.

Knowing this doesn’t sort thirty years of experience for you

There is, of course, an awkward part. It’s relatively easy to agree that you should be selective about what you carry forward. It’s considerably harder when you’re looking at your own career.

Your capabilities overlap. Some of the work you no longer want contains skills and judgement you absolutely do want. Things that feel ordinary to you may be highly valuable to somebody else because you’ve been doing them for so long that you’ve stopped recognising them as expertise.

And some of the most marketable parts of your experience may be precisely the ones you need to give yourself permission not to build around.

You need a way to separate the evidence from the obligation.

The Blueprint takes you through a structured process for collecting the experience, expertise and evidence you’ve accumulated, seeing the patterns inside it, and beginning to identify what has genuine potential for the work or business you want to build now.

It doesn’t ask you to invent a new version of yourself. And it doesn’t assume that everything you’ve become good at belongs in your future.

Because after decades of work, your problem is unlikely to be that you have nothing valuable to offer.

The Second Act Blueprint is 21 pages of guided strategic work designed to help you start collecting it and deciding what deserves to come forward. It’s $59.

And if you’re serious about turning what you’ve accumulated into something of your own, this is where I’d start.

The Second Act Blueprint

That can be particularly frustrating when you are someone who is usually good at figuring things out. You are used to taking something complicated, looking at it from different angles and eventually finding your way through. So you approach this in much the same way. You think. You research. You make lists. You explore possibilities. Perhaps you talk to people you trust. You give yourself more time because surely, eventually, something will become clear.

I’ve been doing some version of that for the past few years.

And until recently, I assumed the difficulty was finding the right answers. I’m no longer sure it was.

Because there is something rather strange about asking yourself what you want to do differently while standing in the middle of everything you’ve already built.

Your life is already in the room

We talk about questions such as What do I want next? as though we approach them with a blank sheet of paper.

We don’t.

By the time you have spent twenty or thirty years building a career, raising a family, earning an income, developing expertise and becoming someone other people rely on, there is very little about that sheet of paper that is blank.

Your experience tells you what you’re good at. Your reputation tells you what other people value in you. Your income tells you what the market has been willing to pay for. Your responsibilities tell you what cannot simply be abandoned. Your calendar tells you what requires attention now. And behind all of it sits years of evidence that certain choices have worked.

None of this is a problem. Much of it is the result of a life you have deliberately built and may still value enormously.

But it isn’t neutral either.

It means that when you start imagining what could come next, some possibilities arrive carrying considerably more weight than others. They are familiar. They make sense. You can explain them. You have evidence for them. Other people can see why you would do them.

And then there are the possibilities that don’t have any of that yet.

I wonder how often we mistake that imbalance for knowing what we want.

Last week, I wrote about how easily competence can recruit us back into work we no longer want to build our lives around. I’ve been thinking since then that the same thing may happen one step earlier.

Some questions come with the answer already inside them

Suppose you’ve spent years in senior leadership and you’re beginning to think seriously about doing something of your own.

You might ask:

How could I turn my leadership experience into a business?

It sounds like a wonderfully open question. But you’ve already made one important decision before you reach the question mark: your leadership experience will sit at the centre of whatever you build.

Or perhaps you ask:

How could I build something of my own alongside my current work?

Again, entirely sensible. But the current work has already been given permanent status. The new thing is what must learn to fit around it.

What could I do that would eventually replace my salary?

A real consideration for many people. But now the economics of one kind of working life have become the benchmark by which another must prove itself.

There is nothing wrong with any of these questions. The answer may ultimately be exactly where you began.

That’s what makes this difficult to notice.

The questions that narrow our thinking are rarely ridiculous ones. They’re usually the sensible ones. The responsible ones. The questions built from everything we know about how the world works.

I caught myself doing exactly this.

For months, I had been thinking about my business, my writing and the work I want to do with experienced women. I wasn’t short of ideas. If anything, I had too many. And because I have thirty years of experience behind me, I could see plenty of commercially viable ways to turn that experience into something people would pay for.

I thought I was considering my options quite broadly.

Then I stepped away from my normal life for two weeks and realised how many of my questions already contained assumptions about the answers.

Distance didn’t make me stop thinking

I went to Spain thinking I needed time.

What I hadn’t anticipated was how much difference it would make to change what was around my thinking.

My normal inputs changed. I read things I wasn’t reading because I needed an answer to something. I studied businesses that had been built in ways quite different from the ones I knew. I followed people because their thinking interested me. I had conversations. I noticed what I kept returning to and what suddenly seemed much less important when I wasn’t looking at it from inside my usual working day.

I didn’t stop thinking. Quite the opposite.

But some of the questions I had been carrying with me began to loosen.

Instead of asking only what I could build from my experience, I became much more interested in which parts of that experience I actually wanted to build around.

Instead of asking how to reach more people, I started asking whether I could recognise the right people more precisely.

Instead of looking only at the offers I had already created, I started looking at the journey between them and asking what problem was still unresolved.

These may sound like small changes in language. They weren’t.

The first version of each question was trying to improve something I had already decided.

The second allowed me to question the decision itself.

That was the part I hadn’t been able to see from so close.

There is a paradox in becoming more experienced.

You have more to work with than you did twenty years ago. More knowledge, more judgement, more relationships, more evidence, more understanding of yourself and, usually, considerably more ability to create value.

Objectively, your options have expanded.

But experience also makes some options much easier to recognise than others.

You know what is viable in the world you already understand. You can assess opportunities quickly because you’ve seen versions of them before. You know what people will pay for, where your credibility transfers and which doors your experience is likely to open.

That judgement is valuable. I have no interest in throwing mine away.

But there is a difference between using experience to evaluate an option and allowing experience to determine which options make it onto the table.

I think that distinction matters enormously when you’re trying to build something different after a long and successful career.

Because the obvious next move may be obvious for a reason.

It sits closest to the evidence you already have.

That doesn’t make it wrong.

But perhaps it shouldn’t make it inevitable either.

You don’t need to pretend your existing life doesn’t matter

There is a tempting conclusion to all of this that I don’t believe.

Ignore the sensible questions. Forget the salary. Stop worrying what anyone thinks. Walk away from everything familiar and dream without limits.

No.

Real lives have consequences.

Income matters. Responsibilities matter. People matter. The life you have spent decades building matters. And if you genuinely love much of it, as I do, the point isn’t to treat it as something you need to escape before you can imagine anything else.

The challenge is almost the opposite.

How do you allow everything you’ve built to inform the decision without allowing it to define the boundaries of the decision?

I don’t have a neat answer to that yet.

Two weeks away happened to give me enough distance to catch some of my own assumptions in the act. Now I’m back inside ordinary life, I’m much more interested in whether that distance can be created deliberately.

Not simply more empty hours in the calendar. Not another morning with a notebook trying harder to answer the same question.

Enough distance to examine the question itself.

Because perhaps when you’ve been thinking about what comes next for months, the useful thing isn’t another answer.

It might be taking the question you’ve been trying so hard to solve and asking:

What have I already decided by asking it this way?

You may decide not to change a thing.

But at least this time, you’ll know you chose it.

Thanks for reading!
Subscribe for free to receive new posts.

Much less time thinking about what I don’t. That has started to change.

There are parts of my working life I have no desire to recreate. Not because I was bad at them. Not because something went terribly wrong. In fact, some of them are things I’m exceptionally good at.

And I think that’s what makes them harder to leave behind.

For most of my working life, being good at something was a perfectly good reason to keep doing it. You become capable, people notice, they trust you with more, the problems become bigger and the responsibility grows. Eventually, a significant part of your professional identity is built around the things you know how to do well.

That’s how much of a career gets built.

But I’m beginning to think that building what comes next requires a different question.

Not simply What am I good at?

But Which of the things I’m good at do I actually want to keep doing?

It’s easier when something has gone wrong

We have a familiar story about change. Something stops working. You become unhappy. The job becomes unbearable. The business fails. You burn out, or someone makes the decision for you.

There is a reason to leave. But what if nothing is particularly wrong?

What if you’re still good at the work? People still value you. You can still solve the problems. You can walk into a complicated situation and know that, one way or another, you’ll probably find your way through it.

You may even still enjoy parts of it.

There is no dramatic ending and no obvious reason to walk away. You simply know that you don’t want to spend another ten years doing more of the same.

I think that’s a much harder feeling to trust.

When something is broken, you have evidence that it needs to change. When something still works perfectly well, all the evidence seems to be telling you to carry on.

The problem with all that evidence

After more than 30 years of work, I have plenty of evidence about what I can do. I know the environments I can operate in, the problems I can solve and where people tend to trust my judgement. I have results, experience and a track record.

I’ve earned that evidence, and I value it enormously. But most of it tells me something about the past.

Of course it does. I have evidence that I can do what I’ve already done. I know people value skills I’ve already demonstrated. I know someone will pay me to solve problems I’ve already solved. I know I can succeed in environments I’ve already learned to navigate.

Then I look towards something new and the evidence becomes much thinner.

There may be an idea I can’t quite leave alone, a curiosity I keep returning to or simply a growing sense that I want to work differently. But I haven’t spent twenty years proving any of that yet.

On one side are decades of evidence. On the other is: I think I want something different.

For someone who has spent much of her career making decisions based on evidence, that’s an interesting imbalance.

It is also one I’m learning to take much more seriously.

Because perhaps one of the difficulties of deciding what comes next after a long career is that the strongest evidence you possess naturally points towards the life you’ve already built.

That doesn’t necessarily make it evidence for the life you should build next.

Competence has a way of recruiting you back

There is another problem with being good at something. Other people keep asking you to do it.

You become the person who can handle the difficult situation, the person who knows how to fix it, the person people call when something has become complicated.

There’s real satisfaction in that. I like being useful. I like solving difficult problems. I like knowing that someone can put something complicated in front of me and trust me to find the structure inside it.

I recognise that part of myself very clearly.

Put a complicated business problem in front of me and my brain immediately starts pulling it apart:

• What’s actually happening here?

• What’s missing?

• What hasn’t been said?

• What decision is everyone avoiding?

I don’t have to force myself to do that. After decades of working that way, it’s simply part of how I think.

I have no desire to lose it.

But I have had to learn the difference between being able to solve a problem and wanting to own that problem.

For a long time, I’m not sure I made that distinction.

If I could help, I helped. If I knew how to solve something, I solved it. If something needed doing and I was capable of doing it, that capability itself became a reason to step in.

Perhaps you recognise some version of that too.

The trouble is that competence creates its own momentum. Other people continue to see you through the things you’ve already proved you can do, and unless you’re careful, you can continue to see yourself that way too.

You can become so good at an old role that it keeps recruiting you back.

Just because you can build it

I’ve been thinking about this particularly in relation to my own business.

When you have decades of experience and decide to build something of your own, one of the obvious questions is: What could I sell?

It’s a sensible commercial question.

Look at your career. Look at your expertise. Identify what you’re unusually good at. Find the problem someone will pay you to solve.

I could do that.

In fact, I could probably build several businesses that way. And that is precisely the problem.

At this stage, lack of capability isn’t the constraint. There are plenty of things I could do and plenty of ways I could make money from what I know.

But I could also build a perfectly viable business around work I no longer particularly want to do.

I could take the most marketable parts of my previous working life, package them neatly, put my own name above the door and recreate much of the work I wanted to move away from.

I would technically have built my own business. But I wouldn’t have built the life I wanted. That distinction has become much more important to me.

Freedom isn’t simply getting to choose who pays you. It also has to include some choice about what you spend your time doing once they have.

So What could I sell? is no longer enough for me.

I’m increasingly interested in another question: Which problems do I still care enough about to spend the next five or ten years solving?

That is a much harder filter. And a much more useful one.

Experience doesn’t disappear when you stop doing the work

There is something else I’ve had to reconsider.

For a long time, leaving valuable capabilities unused seemed slightly wasteful to me. If you’ve spent years learning how to do something and become very good at it, surely you should do something with it.

But experience doesn’t disappear because you stop repeating the work that created it.

It becomes part of how you think.

It changes what you notice, the questions you ask and how quickly you recognise a pattern. It changes how you respond under pressure, how you make decisions and what you can see in a situation that someone with less experience may not see yet.

There are things from my corporate career that I may never do again in the form in which I learned them.

That doesn’t mean those years were wasted. Quite the opposite. They built judgement I use every day.

I don’t have to keep performing every capability I’ve accumulated in order to benefit from having acquired it.

That has been a vital realisation for me.

Some things can simply have served their purpose. They were valuable. I was good at them. They taught me something. They helped build the person making the next decision.

And they can still end there.

What deserves another decade?

Once I stopped asking only what I could do, I found myself asking different questions.

Which parts of my experience still feel alive when I use them? Which problems do I genuinely care about? Where does what I’m unusually good at meet work I still want to become better at? What creates real value for someone else without requiring me to recreate a working life I no longer want?

These aren’t questions about abandoning experience. They’re questions about becoming more selective with it. And perhaps the most uncomfortable one is this:

What am I prepared to stop being known for so that something else has room to develop?

I think that’s particularly difficult after a successful career.

We spend decades building professional identities. Other people come to understand what we do and what we’re good at. We understand ourselves through some of those things too.

Walking away from something because you’ve failed at it is one thing. Choosing not to build your future around something you’ve succeeded at is quite another.

There may be no applause for that decision. It may not even look particularly sensible from the outside. But perhaps not every good decision about the next chapter can be justified by evidence from the last one.

The past gets a vote

I have no interest in abandoning the person I’ve spent decades becoming.

No, she comes with me.

Her judgement, standards and experience come with me. Everything she’s learned about people, decisions, mistakes, successes, pressure, responsibility and building things comes with me too.

I’m very proud of her.

But she doesn’t get to make every decision about what happens next.

The past gets a vote. It doesn’t get a veto.

There are things I’m very good at that I don’t want to do anymore.

A few years ago, I think I would have found that sentence uncomfortable. It would have sounded wasteful somehow, perhaps even a little ungrateful. Now I find it clarifying.

Because maybe the privilege of having accumulated all this experience isn’t that I have to keep using every part of it. Maybe the privilege is finally having enough of it to choose. The past comes with proof. The future usually doesn’t.

At some point, we have to decide whether all that evidence is there to tell us where we’ve been, or whether we’re going to let it decide where we’re allowed to go next.

Pia 🤍

I love hearing your thoughts.
Leave a comment or send me a message.

Leave a comment

Not the kind that happens when you’re asleep, but about my business. What I want to build, how I want it to work, the people I want to work with and what I want my life to look like around it.

It sounds like such an obvious thing to do when you’re building a business, but somewhere over the past few months, I stopped doing it. I hadn’t lost interest or ambition, and I certainly hadn’t stopped thinking about the business. Quite the opposite. I’ve thought about it constantly. What I hadn’t noticed was how practical almost all of that thinking had become.

There was always something that needed doing next.

I had become very good at executing

The past few months have been busy. My other work has demanded a lot from me, while at the same time I’ve been determined to keep building this business. I’ve written and published every week, created new offers, made decisions about positioning and direction, watched what was working and what wasn’t, and changed things as I’ve learned more.

Most of it has happened around an already full working life. Early mornings, evenings, weekends and whatever other space I could find. I’m actually proud that I’ve kept doing it because building something alongside everything else isn’t particularly glamorous. Much of it is simply deciding that something matters enough to keep showing up for it, including on the days when you’re tired and there are easier things you could be doing.

But when I look back at the questions occupying my mind, they were nearly always about execution. What needs my attention? What needs fixing? What do I need to write? What’s working? What isn’t? What should I do next?

All useful questions. All necessary at various points.

But there was another question I hadn’t been asking nearly enough: what do I actually want this business to become?

Then some space appeared

I’m in southern Spain for two weeks with my husband. It’s partly a holiday and partly an opportunity for me to have some proper space to think about my work and how I want the rest of this year to look.

I only arrived on Saturday, but I noticed the difference almost immediately. There are fewer demands around me and, for once, every thought doesn’t have to fit into the small gap between two other responsibilities.

My mind has started wandering, and I’ve realised how much I’ve missed letting it do that.

I’ve been thinking about different ways I could teach and work with people. I’ve been thinking about what should require me to be personally present and what I could create once and allow to keep working without me. I’ve thought about conversations I’d love to have with other women doing interesting work, collaborations that might be fun, and ideas I’ve had before but never had enough space to explore properly.

I’ve also found myself imagining something much more ordinary: what I actually want a normal working week to look like when the business is further along.

Of course I care about what it earns. I’m building a business, not an expensive hobby. But I also care enormously about how I earn it, what my days look like while I’m doing it, how much freedom I have and how much of the business depends on me being present every time something happens.

Those thoughts aren’t entirely new. What feels new is having enough space for them to develop beyond a passing thought before something more urgent pushes them aside.

I hadn’t stopped wanting more.
I’d stopped giving myself enough room to imagine what more could look like.

Planning and dreaming are not the same thing

Anyone who knows me will know that I love a plan. Give me something complicated and I’ll happily turn it into a structure, a sequence and a list of what needs to happen next. That part of me has served me extremely well throughout my working life, and I have no intention of getting rid of it now.

But I’ve been reminded this week that planning and dreaming do very different jobs.

A plan helps me work out how to get somewhere. It doesn’t necessarily make me stop and ask whether somewhere is still where I want to go, or whether there might be another possibility I haven’t considered because I’ve been too busy following the plan already in front of me.

I think that’s what had happened.

I had become so serious about building the business that most of my available energy was going into building what I could already see. I was moving things forward, but I wasn’t spending much time looking beyond the next piece of work and imagining what else might be possible.

There’s an irony in that which isn’t lost on me. So much of my work is about what comes next, yet I’d become so occupied with creating my own next chapter that I’d stopped giving myself much room to imagine it.

I don’t think Spain has magically given me the answer. I haven’t woken up with a completely new business model scribbled on the hotel notepad, and there will be no dramatic announcement about how two days of sunshine changed my life.

What it has given me is enough distance from my normal rhythm to notice what had gone missing.

And perhaps that’s enough for now.

There will be plenty of time for me to turn these thoughts into decisions, plans, spreadsheets and, knowing me, probably a rather detailed framework. I’m very good at that part.

For the moment, I’m going to resist doing it quite so quickly.

I’ve only just started dreaming again.

I’d like to see where it takes me first.

Until next time,
Pia

I love reading and do it constantly. Physical books, audiobooks in the car, while I walk, clean or when I’m training. It is the one habit I have never had to talk myself into.

And I have always done something else with what I read. I take a line and turn it over until I find where it fits. Not just what it says, but what it means for me.

This time, it fit somewhere I did not expect.

The book is The Next Conversation, by Jefferson Fisher, and it is mostly about arguing less and listening more. I was not thinking about my own writing when I picked it up. But partway through a chapter about words, one line stopped me completely.

He writes: “The more words you use, the less I want to listen and the less value your words have. But the fewer words you use, the more I want to pay attention and the more value each word holds.”

I knew immediately it was about me.

A muscle built for a different job

For most of my career, I rarely wrote only as myself. I wrote to employees and boards, in presentations, speeches and recommendations. And in all of those, I wasn’t simply Pia writing. I was also writing from a role.

Precise. Complete. Leaving nothing open, not because anyone was hunting for a mistake, but because that writing was carrying something bigger than me: a strategy, a recommendation, an organisation’s name. You build a particular muscle for that kind of writing.

Nothing gets to stand alone.

Everything gets its supporting sentence.

Then I started writing here, under my own name, to whoever wants to read it, answering to no board and no strategy but my own life.

The old habit came with me, uninvited.

I would write something true and then, almost before I noticed, build a small structure around it. A qualifier. A second sentence whose only job was to hold up the first.

Letting the sentence stand

I had been treating confidence as having every angle covered before I said anything. It turns out it is closer to the opposite: letting a sentence stand as only mine, with nothing behind it but me, and being alright if that is not enough for everyone.

I am not finished unlearning this. I catch the old habit mid-sentence more often than I would like, reaching for one more line just in case.

But I notice it now, and I did not before.

That noticing is where writing like myself, instead of writing like a role, actually begins.

Have you ever caught an old habit following you somewhere it no longer belongs, uninvited, still doing a job nobody asked it to do anymore?

I would love to know what that looks like for you. Hit reply and tell me.

Talk soon,
Pia

Feel free to leave a comment. I love reading them
and get to know you better.

Leave a comment

I knew this pattern

I’ve watched it for thirty years in my work with clients. Something isn’t working, a decision has stalled or the expected result hasn’t appeared, and the instinct is to add. More detail. More explanation. Another attempt to make the point impossible to miss.

I’ve told clients countless times to do the opposite. Before adding anything, look properly at what is already there.

I just hadn’t expected to spend this week catching myself doing exactly the thing I had written about. Apparently, that advice is easier to give from the other side of the table.

The week started well. I felt clear about where my writing was going and increasingly certain about what I wanted it to sound like. Then Tuesday’s numbers came in lower than I had hoped, and by Wednesday some of that certainty had disappeared. My first instinct was to fix it.

By then, I was ready to write my way out of my disappointment. More words. More explanation. A bigger question at the end. Then I caught myself and closed the laptop.

When I came back, I read what I’d actually written rather than what I thought I’d written.

Nothing important was missing. If anything, there was too much. I was explaining ideas that didn’t need quite so much help and defending sentences that could have stood perfectly well on their own.

The problem wasn’t a lack of effort. I simply wasn’t paying close enough attention to what was already there.

What I nearly missed

That was my week. It started with clarity, became considerably less comfortable in the middle, and ended somewhere I hadn’t expected. Not with a better content plan or a clever new way to improve the numbers, but with a clearer understanding of my own voice.

I hadn’t needed to find it. I needed to stop crowding it.

Perhaps that’s why this week has stayed with me.

When something isn’t producing the result we hoped for, our attention moves very quickly towards what is missing. What else should I do? What should I change? What haven’t I tried yet?

Sometimes those are exactly the right questions. But not always.

Sometimes the useful information is already there, buried underneath everything we’re preparing to add to it.

I’ve spent much of my working life helping other people slow down long enough to see that distinction. This week I had the slightly humbling experience of having to do it for myself.

I’m glad I did. Not because I ended the week with all the answers. I didn’t. But I’m clearer about something I care about much more: how I want to write, how I want to pay attention and how easily even thirty years of knowing better can disappear when the problem becomes your own.

Expertise isn’t never falling into the patterns you recognise in everyone else. It’s getting a little quicker at noticing when you do.

Where in your own week might adding more be getting in the way of seeing what’s already there? I’d love to hear what you notice.

Talk soon,
Pia

Leave a comment

I was writing, deleting, looking at everyone else’s work and refreshing my own statistics far more often than I care to admit. Every quiet day made me wonder whether I needed a better idea. Maybe a different direction. Maybe a different strategy. It felt as though everyone else had discovered something I hadn’t.

The strange thing is, I recognised all of it. I’ve spent years watching capable, driven people respond to uncertainty by working harder. More hours. More effort. More ideas. Convinced that the next attempt would finally be the one that changed everything.

This time, it was me.

Somewhere in the middle of the week, I caught myself. I closed my laptop and did something I hadn’t done since all this started. I stopped looking at my business as the person living inside it and looked at it the way I would if it belonged to one of my clients.

For years, I’ve walked into boardrooms and helped leadership teams step back from the day-to-day. We stop looking at individual problems and start looking at the whole business. We put the helicopter glasses on. It’s amazing how often the answer becomes obvious once you’re no longer standing in the middle of the noise.

So I asked myself the same question I would ask any client sitting across the table from me.

“What would you tell them if this wasn’t your own business?”

The answer came almost immediately.

The problem wasn’t my writing. It wasn’t my ideas. It wasn’t even the disappointing engagement I’d been staring at all week.

The problem was that I hadn’t built enough structure.

Every day started with a new decision. What should I write? What should I post? Should I change direction? Was this article good enough? Was LinkedIn saying the right thing? Every quiet day became another opportunity to question the entire strategy.

I realised I wasn’t searching for a better plan.

I was searching for reassurance.

That’s a very different thing.

So I stopped trying to solve the problem with more effort and took my own medicine. I built the same thing I’ve spent years helping organisations build. A structure.

One day each week where the thinking gets done. Where the articles connect to each other. Where the Notes continue the conversation instead of starting a new one. Where LinkedIn has a clear role. Where every piece of work supports the business instead of competing for attention.

The days in between no longer need to be spent searching for inspiration. They’re there to execute decisions that have already been made.

The irony isn’t lost on me.

I already knew all of this.

I simply hadn’t realised how difficult it is to apply your own advice when you’re the one emotionally invested in the outcome.

Most of us think we need more willpower. More discipline. More motivation.

I’m no longer convinced.

I think we need better structures.

Because discipline was never actually my problem. I had plenty of it. What I was missing was something that could carry me on the days my confidence couldn’t.

I’d love to hear your thoughts. Hit reply. I read every message.

Warmly,
Pia

A woman who has spent months building something of her own sits down opposite me or calls me on the phone, and before we get very far she says some version of the same sentence.

“I think I’ve done something wrong.”

Sometimes it’s because the clients haven’t come as quickly as she expected. Sometimes it’s because people aren’t responding in the way she’d imagined. Sometimes it’s simply because the picture in her head no longer matches the one in front of her.

The details are always different.

The feeling rarely is.

What I’ve learned over the years is that those conversations are almost never about the numbers. They’re about what the numbers have quietly persuaded us to believe about ourselves. We mistake feedback for failure. We confuse slower progress with the wrong direction. Before we know it, we’ve stopped looking at information and started looking for evidence that we aren’t as capable as we thought we were.

I know that because, if I’m honest, I caught myself doing exactly the same thing last week.

I spent more time looking at my own numbers than I have in a while. Fewer comments. Slower growth. After more than thirty years of building businesses and helping other people navigate uncertainty, you’d think I would have looked at those numbers with complete objectivity.

I didn’t.

For a little while I forgot everything I would have told someone sitting opposite me.

If one of my clients had brought me those same numbers, we wouldn’t have spent the meeting questioning whether she should give up. We’d have looked at what had changed, what hadn’t, where people were engaging and what the business might be trying to teach us. We’d have been curious long before we became critical.

It’s remarkable how easily that perspective disappears when we’re standing in the middle of our own business.

The very same numbers that look like information when they belong to someone else suddenly feel like judgement when they belong to us.

That was probably my biggest reminder this past week.

Nothing fundamental had changed. I’d still written every article. Published every Note. Continued refining my offers and listening carefully to the conversations I was having with readers. The work hadn’t stopped. The direction hadn’t suddenly become wrong.

The only thing that had changed was the story I had quietly started telling myself.

The older I get, the less I believe clarity comes from pushing harder. More often than not, it comes from creating enough distance to see what’s actually there. When we’re standing in the middle of our own lives or businesses, that’s surprisingly difficult to do. Every decision feels bigger than it is. Every setback feels permanent. Every quiet week starts carrying meaning it was never meant to carry.

Perhaps that’s why I’ve spent so much of my career helping other people step back before deciding what comes next.

Not because I have all the answers.

Because it’s much easier to see patterns when you’re no longer standing on top of them.

This past week reminded me that every now and then I need to become that person for myself.
Once I did, the noise settled surprisingly quickly.

Some things simply need more time. Some things need adjusting. Some things are working better than I realised because I’d been looking in the wrong place.

Businesses are remarkably honest if we’re prepared to listen without taking everything personally. They tell us where people are leaning in, where they’re quietly drifting away and where we’re being invited to pay closer attention. That’s not failure. That’s simply how businesses grow.

Perhaps that’s also why I care so deeply about helping experienced women organise what they’ve already built instead of convincing them they need to become someone new. Most of the answers are already there. They’re simply much harder to recognise when we’re standing too close to them.

Experience doesn’t make us immune to doubt.

It simply gives us a better way back.

If any part of this feels familiar, perhaps it’s time to step back far enough to see what your own experience has been trying to tell you. That’s exactly why I created The Second Act Blueprint. Not because I believe experienced women need another framework, but because I know how difficult it is to see the whole picture when you’re standing in the middle of it.

I’d love to hear your thoughts. Hit reply. I read every message.

Warmly,
Pia

Leave a comment

My own grandson is two and a half now. It doesn’t seem that long ago he was that same tiny bundle everyone wanted to hold.

I’ve heard people talk about the circle of life more times than I can count. I’ve probably said it myself, in the casual way we all do. This weekend it felt different. Standing in that garden, I wasn’t thinking about a phrase. I was watching it happen. A newborn at one end of life. My mother-in-law celebrating eighty years at the other. Four generations together in one place, each at a completely different stage, yet all part of the same story.

Somewhere during that afternoon, I realised I’d started thinking about my own business in exactly the same way.

I spent more than thirty years in executive leadership. Years of decisions, responsibility, successes that opened doors and failures that taught me just as much. Every role added another layer of experience, although I don’t think I realised at the time quite how much I was collecting.

Now all of those years sit behind something entirely different.

This business is still young.

It’s easy to forget that when you’re building something of your own. We compare the beginning of one chapter with the maturity of another. We expect a business that’s only just finding its feet to behave like one that’s had years to earn trust, make mistakes, build a reputation and grow.

But nothing works like that.

Not people.

Not families.

Not careers.

And not businesses.

Looking around that garden this weekend, it suddenly felt obvious. The baby had only just begun his story. My grandson was discovering the world one question at a time. My mother-in-law carried eighty years of memories, friendships and experiences. And here I am, in my fifties, building something that’s entirely my own for the very first time.

Perhaps every stage of life asks something different of us. The beginning asks for patience. The middle asks for resilience. Later on, maybe it asks us to pass something on.

For now, I think my business is asking me for the same thing we’d give any newborn. Time to grow. Time to learn. Time to become what it’s capable of becoming.

If any part of this landed with you, I’d love to hear your thoughts. Simply hit reply. I read every single message.

Warmly,
Pia

I hired people for it. Good ones. I trusted them completely and, if I’m honest, I never envied what they did.

I told myself that was simply how a well-run organisation worked. I built the thing. Someone else sold the thing. Everyone did what they were good at. It’s a perfectly sensible way to lead. What took me much longer to notice is that it also allowed me to avoid something, quietly, for thirty years.

Then this spring I priced my own judgement for the first time.

Nobody else was going to sell the Blueprint for me. There was no Head of Sales to hand it to, no pipeline, no department whose job title made the asking theirs instead of mine. If it was going to sell, I had to be the one to say, plainly, to someone I couldn’t see: I built this. I believe it’s worth paying for. I’d like you to buy it.

I won’t pretend that was comfortable. There’s a particular kind of exposure in it that leading a team never quite required. When you’re employed, a company has already decided you’re credible. You walk into the room carrying its reputation alongside your own. When your name is on the door, none of that comes with you. It’s just you, the work you’ve created, and the quiet question of whether someone else believes it’s valuable too.

But here’s what I got wrong for thirty years. I thought selling was a different skill from leading. A separate muscle. One I’d simply never trained.

It isn’t.

The things that made me effective as a leader, being clear about the problem, having genuine conviction in the solution, caring more about the outcome than about being liked, are exactly the things asking for the sale requires. It isn’t a different skill aimed at a different task. It’s the same one, finally aimed at myself.

I’m still not completely at ease with it. I don’t think that discomfort disappears, and I’ve stopped expecting it to. But I’ve noticed something changing underneath it. The asking feels less like a performance now and more like an extension of the work itself. Not a departure from leadership, but simply the last room in the house I’d never walked into.

It turns out I wasn’t learning how to sell.

I was learning how to stand behind my own name.

If you’re building something of your own, I’d genuinely love to hear what it is. Hit reply and tell me. I read every one.

Warmly,
Pia

P.S. If you’re curious what came out the other side of learning this, The Second Act Blueprint is the toolkit I built from it.